Please check out the Hippeaux's weekly posts at SNY affiliate, It's About The Money.

Friday, October 15, 2010

A-Roid Bankrupted The Rangers, Now Is The Time For Vengeance (ALCS Preview)

Expanding upon the superlative "Narrative Likability" grade I gave the Rangers prior to the ALDS, let's look at three reasons why the Rangers deserve to beat the Yankees:

3.) As I heard Michael Wilbon say on PTI earlier this week, "You can't give this anything but an A+."  He was referring to decision by Josh Hamilton's teammates to forego the champagne in favor of ginger ale following their Game 5 victory over the Rays.  The Rangers have chemistry in spades and this was just the most recent evidence of it.

2.) Dom Perignon v. Schweppes is actually a pretty good metaphor for Yankees v. Rangers.  New York has, famously, the highest payroll in baseball - over $213 Million in 2010, highest in MLB history - while the Rangers have easily the lowest payroll among playoff teams.  In fact, in the American League, only Oakland and Cleveland spent less than Texas this season.  The Rangers combined salaries (for the 30+ players who spent time on the MLB roster this season) come in at less than $65 Million.  A-Rod, C. C. Sabathia, and Derek Jeter will, by themselves, earn $76 Million in 2010.

1.) Just in case you need one more reason to call A-Rod a dick: how about the fact that he was represented on the "creditors committee" during the Rangers bankruptcy hearings earlier this year.  That's right, the man whose record-setting salary helped run John Hicks and his baseball franchise into the ground (and who will make $32 Million from the Yanks in 2010) was still lobbying hard to get $24.9 Million of the $67 Million the Rangers agreed to give him just to get him off their team way back in 2004!  You can bet, if Nolan Ryan were starting in this ALCS, he'd be on the lookout for timely opportunities to play some chin music for the smarmiest superstar.  We'll just have to wait and see how much of the Rangers president has rubbed off on his team.

Okay, now here's three reasons the Rangers can beat the Yankees:

3.) One theory that's been leveled in the wake of the largely misunderstood Moneyball explosion is that while the Three-Outcomes approach (walk, strikeout, homers) works well over the course of the regular season, a more diverse offensive strategy is necessary in the postseason.  In the first round of the ALDS, the Ranger beat a team, the Rays, who were definitely something of a Three-Outcomes team.  They led the league in strikeouts and walks, were sixth in homers, and were second-to-last in batting average.  The Rangers, meanwhile, topped the AL in batting average and were near the bottom in both strikeouts (11th) and walks (8th), while still getting their fair share of power (5th in HR).  I had theorized that the extreme strike-throwing abilities of Cliff Lee, C. J. Wilson, and Colby Lewis might make problems for the Rays, and that was apparently the case, as the Rangers staff managed a nearly 5-to-1 K/BB ratio during the ALDS.  The Yankees are not as drastically reliant on patience and power as the Rays, but they were 2nd in walks, 7th in strikeouts, 2nd in homers, and 7th in average.  In the first round, 7 of the 17 Yankee RBI were created by the long ball and 3 of their 17 runs were created by walks.  If the Rangers cut down on those types of production, they will dramatically improve upon Minnesota's results.

2.)  In the post-PED era, speed kills.  In the first round, New York matched up against a plodding team who ranked 13th in the AL in steals this season.  The Twins could not expose one of New York's most apparent flaws, their inability to hold runners and prevent steals. The Yankee catching tandem led the league in errors and allowed an astounding stolen-base success rate (85.2%).  You can bet the Rangers, who swiped six bags against the Rays, and were 5th in the AL in steals during the regular season, will never stop running on Jorge Posada.

1.) Of course, Cliff Lee famously baffled the Yankees last October, winning both of his World Series starts.  For him to get two in this ALCS, it will require the series to get to seven games.  If it get there, however, the Rangers are in good shape.  Including the postseason, since 2008 (when Lee's "coming-out" began) the lefty is 6-1 against New York, with a 2.31 ERA.  And, he's not the only tough lefty on the Rangers staff.  C. J. Wilson is slated for a pair of starts against Yankee Ace, C. C. Sabathia.  Over their last 15 starts, here's how each fared:

Sabathia: 9-4, 3.29 ERA, 1.26 WHIP, 7.85 K/9, 668 OOPS, 106.2 IP
Wilson: 8-3, 3.36 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 8.70 K/9, 618 OOPS, 91 IP

Was Sabathia really a better pitcher?  If the Texas lefties win, three of their four starts, the Rangers likely head to the World Series.  So, much rides on how Wilson pitches tonight.


Anonymous said...

Tom Hicks bankrupted the Rangers, dummy. Chan Ho Park was the bigger waste, since A-Rod actually delivereed, but you're not whining about that are you? Not really fair to complain that the Yankees run their franchise properly.

Goh said...

this is such a typical yankee fan response. clearly didn't read anything but the headline, which is kinda facetious. accuses hippeaux of whining, which he isn't. nor does he say anything about how the yanks run their franchise, just talks about how likable the rangers are and how they might win. sure, hicks was an idiot for signing a-rod and park was a bust, but that's not really relevant. hippeaux's merely pointing out the karmic possibilities of this narrative. nobody gives a shit what you say when you don't actually read anything.

tomemos said...

Wow, this discussion is off to a rousing start already. Anyway, I'm with you (Hippeaux) with reasons 3 and 2 for why we should root for the Rangers, but I can't go along with reason 1 (the A-Rod Factor). I know you're being tongue in cheek and don't actually expect A-Rod to forgo the money he's contracted to receive, but I think that Tom Hicks, playing the role of Yet Another Idiot Rich Guy Who Thinks He Can Buy a Ring, makes a way more convincing villain than the world-class baseball player who did not force anyone to give him the richest contract in baseball.

tomemos said...

Also, can I point out that so far I'm 4-0 on the results of the playoff series (if not the number of games)? Now I just have to pray I was wrong about the NLCS…

Hippeaux said...

First of all, thanks for all the feedback.

Let's be clear, I am not in the "baseball players make too much money" camp. Of course, Hicks is responsible and, of course, A-Rod should have recourse for getting every penny he was guaranteed in his contract. The headline was obviously hyperbolic, but I can see how that point could be missed.

Again, as an extension of the "Narrative Likability" posts, I was merely pointing out that the fact that the third baseman for one team was recently appointed to the "creditors committee" for another is an oddly compelling addition to the ALCS storyline. I could've also pointed out that Greg Golson's salary is being supplemented by the Rangers this season, or that Mark Teixeira was the trade bait that netted Texas Elvis Andrus and Neftali Feliz (among others), but I didn't think those facts were nearly as quirky and interesting.

I will say, however, as far as baseball "villains" go, I don't know how you get much better than A-Rod. He's obscenely rich, even by the standards of his peers. He's got that scarlet letter that pisses people off. He's clearly an unremitting narcissist (self-portrait as centaur, seriously?). He's a poor sport (remember the glove-slapping incident in the '04 ALCS). Many of his teammates don't seem to particularly like him (Jeter, etc.). Many of his opponents despise him (Braden, etc.). Sure, he's a really good player, but he's also a massive dick. It doesn't necessarily have anything to do with his contract (although, money corrupts, right?), but I'll stand behind that statement. There's just too much evidence supporting the conclusion that A-Rod is a massive dick.